Ernest Giardino v. Town of Chapin, South Carolina

Case Summary:
In Chapin, South Carolina, Ernest Giardino has filed suit against the Town of Chapin, alleging that officials discriminated against him and violated his constitutional rights. Giardino, a man of faith, sought to live out his convictions publicly and participate in local governance. Instead, he was repeatedly targeted and marginalized by town officials.

The complaint describes how Chapin leaders denied Giardino equal opportunities to serve, excluding him from committees and community functions where others were welcomed. Officials allegedly blocked his input in civic matters, dismissed his viewpoints because of their religious grounding, and created a hostile environment that made his participation nearly impossible. The lawsuit argues that this systematic sidelining was not about his qualifications or conduct, but about silencing his faith-driven convictions.

At stake is whether small-town governments can use quiet forms of exclusion — denial of access, procedural stonewalling, selective enforcement — to push believers out of public life. Giardino’s case shines a light on these tactics, exposing how discrimination often works not by overt bans, but by subtle, persistent marginalization.

Guardian Perspective:
Guardians, this case is a reminder that the battle for freedom is not fought only in Washington or state capitals — it begins in our hometowns. When local leaders treat faithful citizens as second-class because of their convictions, they trample both the Constitution and the Creator’s design for justice.

This is a Restore moment: restore integrity and fairness in our communities by standing alongside those who refuse to bow to discrimination. Scripture warns us in Micah 6:8 that the Lord requires us “to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God.” Giardino’s stand calls us to the same — courage in faith, even against local powers.


Learn More:

Ernest Giardino - Cases - First Liberty
Ernest Giardino of Chapin, South Carolina was told that he was required to apply for a “public demonstration permit” to hold religious-themed signs on a public sidewalk. If the application was approved, he would need to change sidewalk corners every 15 minutes with a maximum display time of 30 minutes.

Share this post

Written by

Comments

Latest Posts