Scholars at two of America's most credible universities just published a report saying faith is an untapped resource for closing the education gap. Formed believers have known this for generations. The data has finally caught up.
The report didn't come from a seminary or a think tank with a recognizable ideological brand. It came from the BYU Wheatley Institute and the Leadership Initiative for Faith and Education at Harvard University.
Published last week, "Faith in Educational Renewal" makes a straightforward argument: the religious faith of students, their families, and their teachers is a measurable, underutilized resource for improving academic outcomes — particularly for children from working-class and lower-income backgrounds. Deseret News The researchers didn't make this case theologically. They made it empirically.
The report opens with Horace Mann, the 19th-century reformer who built the architecture of American public education on the conviction that universal schooling would become "a great equalizer of the conditions of men." Nearly two centuries later, the researchers note, large gaps in learning opportunities persist by student race and ethnicity, and opportunity gaps by gender and family income are widening. Deseret News
Their question was simple: what actually works? Their answer surprised the circles most likely to resist it.
Religious participation is associated with more academic learning in school, higher levels of formal schooling, and more aspirations for higher education. Students from working-class families benefit more in school from religious participation than do their high-income peers. Religious teachers draw on their spirituality to manage stress, sustain enthusiasm, and make instructional decisions for the benefit of their students. Deseret News
The researchers were careful to say they are not endorsing religious doctrine in public schools. Their recommendations are explicitly nonsectarian. But the data they assembled points in one direction: faith communities and the values they transmit are doing something for children that policy alone has not been able to replicate.
There is a long-running assumption embedded in mainstream educational policy: that faith is, at best, a private matter irrelevant to academic outcomes. The Harvard-BYU report doesn't argue against that assumption on philosophical grounds. It simply presents data that contradicts it.
What faith communities produce — moral formation, accountability structures, social networks, a sense of purpose and calling — turns out to matter enormously in the development of children. The researchers call this an "untapped resource." That phrase is precise. The resource has always been there. The question is why it was overlooked, and the answer isn't complicated: for decades, the dominant framework in American education policy treated the reduction of religious influence as a sign of progress. A generation of students bore the cost of that assumption.
None of this will be surprising to anyone who grew up in a functioning faith community, watched what it did for their neighbors' children, or taught Sunday school and saw how the moral vocabulary of Scripture gave young people something to orient their lives around that the school system could not provide.
The research community has now documented what lived experience already knew. That is useful — not because the data validates the conviction, but because it creates common ground with people who would not have accepted the conviction on its own terms.
The question now is whether the institutions responsible for educating American children will act on it. The history of education reform suggests that data, by itself, rarely changes anything. What changes things is when enough people inside and outside the system insist that the evidence be taken seriously — and build the structures, partnerships, and expectations that make it possible.
Faith communities in America have spent several decades being told, in various ways, that what they offer is too private, too particular, and too controversial to contribute to public life. The Harvard-BYU report doesn't resolve that debate. But it raises a pointed question: if the outcomes associated with faith participation are as consistent and as significant as the data suggests, what exactly is being protected by keeping that resource at arm's length?
The researchers are asking institutions to consider new partnerships — school-faith collaborations, mentoring networks, tutoring programs built on the existing infrastructure of congregations that already serve the neighborhoods where the gaps are widest.
That is a reasonable ask. And the people best positioned to respond to it are the ones who have been building those institutions all along — not waiting for permission from the people who spent years explaining why it wasn't necessary.
Learn more about The Guardians' Cross → theguardianscross.org
